Find missing argument to -exec' in bash
WebOct 9, 2009 · 3. Read the resulting file paths -- this method correctly handles paths with embedded spaces. 4. Read the file itself and get a total of the number of occurrences of the search string in each file. 5. Test the result and only print file … WebAug 4, 2024 · In this tutorial, we’ll explore the -exec argument of the Linux find command. This argument extends find ‘s capabilities, and makes it the swiss-army knife that it’s known to be. We’ll discuss the use of -exec to execute commands and shell functions, as well as how to control them to improve the efficacy of their execution. 2.
Find missing argument to -exec' in bash
Did you know?
WebYou could do away with find for your example: Code: grep -c aString . -R --include="*access*2009.09*" For exec commands, you can place complex sequences inside a script file, and just '-exec sh script.sh', or do it as a one liner, eg: Code: find . -name "*access*2009.09*" -print -exec sh -c 'grep aString $0 wc' {} \; AlucardZero WebJun 6, 2024 · The -exec option takes an external utility with optional arguments as its argument and executes it. If the string {} is present anywhere in the given command, each instance of it will be replaced by the pathname currently being processed (e.g. ./some/path/FILENAME ). In most shells, the two characters {} does not need to be quoted.
WebJul 7, 2015 · Using -exec with a semicolon (find . -exec ls '{}' \;), will execute. ls file1 ls file2 ls file3 But if you use a plus sign instead (find . -exec ls '{}' \+), all filenames will be … WebMar 17, 2015 · There are unavoidable security problems surrounding use of the -exec action; you should use the -execdir option instead. -exec command {} + This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the selected files, but the command line is built by appending each selected file name at the end; the total number of invocations of the …
WebMar 6, 2024 · The command find . -type f -exec sendmail -t < {} \; gives me -bash: {}: No such file or directory It doesn't seem to like the <. And this find . type -f -exec cat {} sendmail -t \; gives me find: missing argument to `-exec' It doesn't seem to like the . What is wrong? linux find exec Share Improve this question Follow edited Mar 6, 2024 … WebApr 19, 2015 · @Zacharee1: The find command will delete all files called with this name in the current directory and all of its subdirectories (at any depth). – Dennis Apr 18, 2015 at 21:07 3 Or instead of using -exec rm just use -delete directly. – Braiam Apr 19, 2015 at 0:59 Add a comment 2 Answers Sorted by: 30
WebApr 26, 2024 · find: missing argument to -exec The workaround is to use syntax {} additional parameters \; which does work but will execute the command once for every …
WebJul 11, 2024 · Well, a possible approach would be: 1) Look at the command you told find to run (which is "chmod 0644 "). 2) Figure out what the command does (it sets permissions 0644, aka rw-r--r--, for all files specified). 3) Use ls -l to look at the files and verify that they indeed have the permissions that chmod was supposed to set. – user1686 euphoria stereotypesWebApr 28, 2024 · To see how exec works in Bash scripts, do the following: 1. Open a text editor, such as Nano, and create a script file: nano [script name] 2. Paste the following code: #!/bin/bash while true do echo "1. Update " echo "2. Upgrade " echo "3. euphoria still don\\u0027t know my name 1 hourWebNov 27, 2024 · Problem: I just issued a Linux find command, and got the following error message: find: missing argument to -exec. Solution: Amazingly, it turns out that the … euphoria stand still like a hummingbirdWebNov 17, 2012 · find: missing argument to `-exec' Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux. Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community. You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. firmware ariva t75WebJan 12, 2024 · It's not obvious, but find on Linux expects ; (or +) as an argument somewhere after -exec, not \;. The backslash is for the shell. The problem is ; is special for the shell, it's a command terminator. If you used ;, the shell would interpret it as such, find wouldn't see it at all. euphoria star offers hints season finaleWebSep 19, 2014 · As others have said, find's -exec needs to be terminated. However I would actually suggest using + instead of \;.This only works for some commands but using + will build and run a much more efficient command.. For example, if you have three files (a, b and c) in a directory and you run find -exec echo {} \; it will execute:echo a echo b echo c euphoria still don\u0027t know my name lyricsfirmware archive