WebManeka Gandhi vs. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597. (vi). Chameli Singh v State of UP, 1996 (2) SCC 549, Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity and Ors., vs. State of West Bengal., 1996(4) SCC 37, Francis Coralie Mullin v … WebDelhi Administrator, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 392 and Francis Coralie Mulin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi and ors., [19811 1 S.C.C. 608, referred to. JUDGMENT: ORIGINAL JURISDICTlON: Writ Petition No. 1053 of 1982. (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). Suleman Khurshid and K.K. Luthra for the Petitioner. ...
Tag: Francis Coralie vs. Union Territory of Delhi: Case-Comment
Web22 Francis Coralie Mullin vs The Administrator (1981) 49 Supra Note, 50Ibid. 23 Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi, AIR 1981 SC 746. 13 MEMORIAL ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS 2ND NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2024. on part of the Applicant, this was affected as the main objective of this programme was at stake. WebISSUE: Whether the right to life under Article 21 is limited only to protection of limb or faculty or does it go further and embrace something more? Whether or not a person … cnb archiv
The Peremptory Demolition of Slums is a Violation of the Law
WebMay 8, 2024 · Author: Ayush Jain, Unitedworld School of Law, Gandhinagar, Gujarat Francis Coralie vs. Union Territory of Delhi: Case-Comment Bench: Hon’bleJustice … WebIn the case of Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory for Delhi, 1981, the Supreme Court found, “no prisoners’ right to have interviews with members of his family and friends as constitutionally valid under Articles 14 and 21 unless its reasonable, fair and just”. In the case of P. Nedumaran v. WebJul 9, 2024 · In ["Francis Coralie Mullin Vs Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi & Ors." (1981) 1 SCC. 608], the Supreme Court held that "every limb or faculty" that helps enjoy life must be protected by ... caintuck baffles