WebMiller v. California (No. 70-73) Argued: January 18-19, 1972. Decided: June 21, 1973 ___ Syllabus; Opinion, Burger; Dissent, Douglas; Dissent, Brennan; Syllabus. Appellant … WebThe Miller test for obscenity includes the following criteria: (1) whether ‘the average person, applying contemporary community standards’ would find that the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ appeals to ‘prurient interest’ (2) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state …

Reggie Miller - Wikipedia

WebMiller, after conducting a mass mailing campaign to advertise the sale of "adult" material, was convicted of violating a California statute prohibiting the distribution of obscene … WebThe Court held that such a definition of obscenity gave sufficient fair warning and satisfied the demands of Due Process. Brennan later reversed his position on this issue in Miller v. California (1973). mayline - c-file 5 drawer flat files

米勒诉加利福尼亚州案 - 维基百科，自由的百科全书

WebThe major obscenity decision in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), provided the basis for an important test that the Supreme Court used to determine whether material was obscene or constitutionally protected.. Court had struggled to define obscenity. The Court had long held that there were a few types of expression that merited no First Amendment … WebMiller v. California: Arguably the most important in a series of late-twentieth-century Supreme Court cases laying down the definition of Obscenity and setting down the … WebMiller was convicted in state court by the State of California (plaintiff), under a California criminal obscenity statute which prohibited the distribution of obscene materials. The court of appeals affirmed, and … mayline c file 5 drawer